adamwill's meeting titled "F22-blocker-review" ended in #fedora-blocker-review

notifications at fedoraproject.org notifications at fedoraproject.org
Tue Apr 28 19:05:49 UTC 2015


==========================================
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==========================================


Meeting started by adamw at 16:24:46 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-04-28/f22-blocker-review.2015-04-28-16.24.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (adamw, 16:24:47)

* Introduction  (adamw, 16:27:13)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
    bugs.  (adamw, 16:27:13)
  * We'll be following the process outlined at:  (adamw, 16:27:13)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (adamw, 16:27:13)
  * The bugs up for review today are available at:  (adamw, 16:27:15)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (adamw,
    16:27:17)
  * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:  (adamw,
    16:27:19)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria
    (adamw, 16:27:21)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria
    (adamw, 16:27:23)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria
    (adamw, 16:27:25)
  * 9 Proposed Blockers  (adamw, 16:27:29)
  * 11 Accepted Blockers  (adamw, 16:27:29)
  * 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions  (adamw, 16:27:31)
  * 3 Accepted Freeze Exceptions  (adamw, 16:27:33)
  * oddshocks will secretarialize, adamw will check his work  (adamw,
    16:31:06)

* (1211122) No closest mirror can be found from behind a proxy  (adamw,
  16:32:11)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211122   (adamw,
    16:32:11)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST  (adamw, 16:32:12)
  * AGREED: 1211122 - RejectedBlocker - this is a problem for those
    using proxies, but it would be sufficiently workaroundable. (In
    practice the fix is landing anyway.)  (adamw, 16:58:12)

* (1211746) ValueError: new size is too large  (adamw, 16:58:23)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211746   (adamw,
    16:58:23)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (adamw, 16:58:23)
  * AGREED: 1211746 - AcceptedBlocker - accepted as a blocker as a
    violation of "When using the custom partitioning flow, the installer
    must be able to: Reject or disallow invalid disk and volume
    configurations without crashing."  (adamw, 17:07:59)

* (1214441) btrfs raid1 fails to boot after successful installation
  (adamw, 17:08:07)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214441   (adamw,
    17:08:07)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (adamw, 17:08:07)
  * AGREED: 1214441 - RejectedBlocker - this is in a fairly uncommonly
    used configuration (btrfs RAID) and there is a simple workaround
    (using the non-live installer). we believe documenting the
    workaround is sufficient to deal with this case.  (adamw, 17:19:09)

* (1210047) [abrt] gnome-contacts: _g_log_abort():
  gnome-contacts-search-provider killed by SIGTRAP  (adamw, 17:19:34)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210047   (adamw,
    17:19:34)
  * Proposed Blocker, gnome-contacts, NEW  (adamw, 17:19:34)
  * AGREED: 1210047 - RejectedBlocker - this does not seem to be
    occurring frequently enough (given the data we have) to be a blocker
    (the point of the criterion is not to look unprofessional by
    triggering crashes on all installs; this seems to happen only
    rarely)  (adamw, 17:26:56)

* (1211948) Help with packagekit api  (adamw, 17:27:28)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211948   (adamw,
    17:27:29)
  * Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW  (adamw, 17:27:29)
  * AGREED: 1211948 - RejectedBlocker - this is certainly a significant
    bug that should be treated with priority, but it does not seem to be
    worth blocking the release for. It could be satisfactorily fixed
    with a post-release update if it cannot be fixed before release. If
    a fix appears after the Final freeze we would be willing to consider
    freeze exception status.  (adamw, 17:34:13)

* (1215839) kernel panic on first boot of newly installed system,
  missing initrd line in grub.cfg  (adamw, 17:34:23)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215839   (adamw,
    17:34:24)
  * Proposed Blocker, grubby, NEW  (adamw, 17:34:24)
  * AGREED: 1215839 - AcceptedBlocker - violates e.g. "A system
    installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in
    screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a
    user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility."
    (adamw, 17:38:14)

* (1211978) mock does not use "yum-deprecated" if yum >= 3.4.3-505 is
  installed  (adamw, 17:38:21)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211978   (adamw,
    17:38:21)
  * Proposed Blocker, mock, MODIFIED  (adamw, 17:38:22)
  * AGREED: 1211978 - RejectedBlocker - we're not aware of any case
    where this bug affects release critical or critpath stuff, so it
    could be fixed as a regular update if necessary.  (adamw, 17:46:12)

* (1160424) MDRaidError: name_from_md_node(md126p1) failed  (adamw,
  17:46:27)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160424   (adamw,
    17:46:27)
  * Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, ASSIGNED  (adamw, 17:46:27)
  * AGREED: 1160424 - RejectedBlocker - this is a worrying bug but so
    far it has been difficult to pin down and appears to only affect
    RAID sets in specific states. If more details emerge that indicate
    it is very commonly encountered by those attempting to install on
    firmware RAID, we will reconsider it.  (adamw, 18:05:17)

* (1214241) KeyError: 'fedora-pool'  (adamw, 18:05:55)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214241   (adamw,
    18:05:55)
  * Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, POST  (adamw, 18:05:56)
  * AGREED: 1214241 - AcceptedBlocker - violates "The installer must be
    able to create and install to any workable partition layout using
    any file system and/or container format combination offered in a
    default installer configuration."  (adamw, 18:13:45)
  * moving on to accepted blocker review  (adamw, 18:17:27)

* (1212206) System doesn't boot with LVM data volume on iSCSI  (adamw,
  18:17:29)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212206   (adamw,
    18:17:29)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED  (adamw, 18:17:29)
  * this is probably fixed in the pending anaconda update (and hence
    will be in Final TC1), the update just needs editing to list it
    (adamw, 18:18:21)

* (1209941) upgraded system does not reboot automatically, ctrl+alt+del
  is needed: Failed unmounting /sysroot/proc  (adamw, 18:18:28)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209941   (adamw,
    18:18:28)
  * Accepted Blocker, fedup-dracut, NEW  (adamw, 18:18:28)
  * lots of activity from reporters here, but little from the developer
    (adamw, 18:24:02)
  * ACTION: secretary to post a comment pinging the dev and asking for
    status  (adamw, 18:24:13)

* (1166650) [abrt] liveusb-creator:
  connection.py:651:call_blocking:DBusException:
  org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: Method "Get" with signature
  "ss" on interface "org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" doesn't exist
  (adamw, 18:24:32)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166650   (adamw,
    18:24:33)
  * Accepted Blocker, liveusb-creator, NEW  (adamw, 18:24:33)
  * we haven't yet heard from the developer about this one  (adamw,
    18:30:14)
  * ACTION: secretary to post a comment requesting status from the
    developer  (adamw, 18:30:21)

* (1206760) Plasma desktop doesn't notify for available updates  (adamw,
  18:30:31)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206760   (adamw,
    18:30:32)
  * Accepted Blocker, plasma-pk-updates, ASSIGNED  (adamw, 18:30:32)
  * KDE team is aware and actively working on this bug, no action
    necessary  (adamw, 18:32:32)

* (1200161) Non-Fatal SELINUX Faults exist during bootup of 22_Alpha_RC3
  (adamw, 18:32:40)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200161   (adamw,
    18:32:40)
  * Accepted Blocker, rng-tools, NEW  (adamw, 18:32:40)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172235   (adamw,
    18:35:12)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181308 is the
    'parent' execmod-on-rngd bug  (adamw, 18:36:17)
  * this is fairly old and may well be fixed already  (adamw, 18:39:18)
  * ACTION: secretary to ask reporter whether the first AVC is still a
    problem on 22 Beta or Final TC1  (adamw, 18:39:38)

* (1190377) SELinux is preventing polkitd from 'read' accesses on the
  lnk_file localtime.  (adamw, 18:39:58)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190377   (adamw,
    18:39:58)
  * Accepted Blocker, systemd, NEW  (adamw, 18:39:58)
  * this bug seems fairly active with input from devs and testers, no
    action needed  (adamw, 18:44:55)

* (1200559) [abrt] totem: browse_cb(): totem killed by SIGABRT  (adamw,
  18:45:21)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200559   (adamw,
    18:45:21)
  * Accepted Blocker, totem, NEW  (adamw, 18:45:22)
  * no response from the developer yet  (adamw, 18:49:46)
  * ACTION: secretary to post comment asking dev for status  (adamw,
    18:50:11)

* Open floor  (adamw, 18:51:09)
  * ACTION: roshi to re-check #1210047 on current i386 images  (adamw,
    19:00:00)

Meeting ended at 19:05:37 UTC.




Action Items
------------
* secretary to post a comment pinging the dev and asking for status
* secretary to post a comment requesting status from the developer
* secretary to ask reporter whether the first AVC is still a problem on
  22 Beta or Final TC1
* secretary to post comment asking dev for status
* roshi to re-check #1210047 on current i386 images




Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* roshi
  * roshi to re-check #1210047 on current i386 images
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * secretary to post a comment pinging the dev and asking for status
  * secretary to post a comment requesting status from the developer
  * secretary to ask reporter whether the first AVC is still a problem
    on 22 Beta or Final TC1
  * secretary to post comment asking dev for status




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (238)
* oddshocks (43)
* sgallagh (39)
* potty (20)
* danofsatx (16)
* potty_ (15)
* roshi (10)
* zodbot (4)
* dgilmore (4)
* satellit_e (4)
* mclasen (2)
* satellit (1)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

	https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-04-28/f22-blocker-review.2015-04-28-16.24.html

--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/fmnmeetingminutes.id.fedoraproject.org/email/29368


More information about the meetingminutes mailing list