[Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 7 08:12:55 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122
Kalev Lember <kalev at smartlink.ee> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kalev at smartlink.ee
Bug 492122 depends on bug 492110, which changed state.
Bug 492110 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsigc++20 - MinGW Windows port of the typesafe signal framework for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492110
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember <kalev at smartlink.ee> 2009-04-07 04:12:55 EDT ---
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281702
Rpmlint is quiet:
$ rpmlint mingw32-cairomm-1.8.0-1.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw32-cairomm-1.8.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ OK
! needs attention
+ rpmlint output
+ Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ Specfile name matches the package base name
+ Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
LGPLv2+
+ License matches the actual package license
It is also the same as in the corresponding Fedora cairomm package
+ The package contains the license file (COPYING)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm
15c0f56eee57bb418c38463a6297d715 cairomm-1.8.0.tar.gz
15c0f56eee57bb418c38463a6297d715 SRPM/cairomm-1.8.0.tar.gz
+ Package builds in mock (Fedora Rawhide i586)
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun
+ Does not use Prefix: /usr
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ %files has %defattr
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Consistent use of macros
+ Package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
+ Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Filenames must be valid UTF-8
Note: I am not in packager group, so I cannot set fedora‑review+ flag.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the mingw
mailing list