[Bug 802161] Review Request: mingw-w64-tools - Supplementary tools which are part of the mingw-w64 toolchain

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802161

Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj |
                   |ect.org)                    |

--- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> 2012-03-14 18:59:39 EDT ---
Thank you for taking this package for review!

The spelling errors which rpmlint mentions can usually be ignored. Most
software development terms aren't mentioned in the English dictionary so these
kind of warnings are mostly bogus :)

I agree with your proposal about using the mingw-w64- prefix for all tools. In
the .spec file no custom renames are done. The binary filenames are all
auto-generated by the build system used. I'll try to come up with a patch so it
can be properly resolved upstream

I don't know where the file-size mismatch warning comes from. It may be an
sourceforge download thingie, but if you want to be sure you can try to
generate md5sums of both the tarball which is bundled in the .src.rpm and the
tarball which is published on sourceforge and see if they match

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.