Surveying active Fedora Mono packagers

[Paul Lange]

Am Sonntag, den 23.08.2009, 13:30 -0400 schrieb Michel Salim:
> On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 18:45 +0200, David Nielsen wrote:
> 
> 
> >         * boo 0.9.1 (package is ready, only needs import)
> > 
> > 
> > How does boo 0.9.1 jive with the rest of the system.. incompatible?.
> > Also when it gets imported please use the announcement lists to let
> > people know you are bumping a language. 
> 
> Make sure to do
> 
>   repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires boo
> 
> and give a heads-up to the relevant package maintainers
> (PGKNAME-owner at fedoraproject.org should work)
> 
> so far it's only Banshee that's affected. I used to maintain it, and
> still comaintain -- unfortunately I'm on Rawhide and there's this
> bizarre bug I cannot track down yet, in that both Banshee 1.4.3 and
> 1.5.0 (1.6.0-beta1) would cause a segfault.
> 
> For stable releases, since it requires rebuilding Banshee, I'd say do
> the Koji build but don't push an update yet. Let the Banshee maintainers
> know, and if it's stable, one of us can ask for boo-0.9.1 to be tagged
> dist-override so we can build Banshee against it and push a combined
> update.

I updated the package some time ago, mainly for banshee 1.6, and asked
Paul F. Johnson for an import or commit rights but he didn't answer yet.
Seems like I have the same problem like Christian with mono-addins.

btw, is there an advanced packager in the list who could push the
update? source rpm is here: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/boo/

regards,
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mono/attachments/20090823/b0c14d2e/attachment.bin