First results from Mono packaging rework

[Paul]

Hi,

> > I've tested successfully the banshee, f-spot, tomboy and monodevelop and
> > couldn't find any major issues in the core functions of the packages.
> > Sure, it was just a quick test.
> > 
> Paul, any idea? I guess we could always update libgdiplus as well, but
> I'm assuming the version requirement is put there intentinoally.

I've no problem pushing 2.4.2 (and bits) onto f11...

TTFN

Paul

-- 
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mono/attachments/20090826/ad278887/attachment.bin