[Fedora-music-list] Naming of Ardour packages

[Brian Monroe]

Looking at the wiki guide the way suggested is to :
<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_name>

The most current version: ardour
Previous version names: ardour2 (or ardour3.5)

This would differ from having ardour be a meta package.

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:55 AM Martin Tarenskeen <m.tarenskeen at zonnet.nl>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 8 May 2015, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>
> >> - Move version 2 to its own ardour2 package. This would get it
> >> re-reviewed but I guess that's a mere formality.
> >> - Reuse the ardour package as a meta-package which simply requires the
> >> latest versioned package.
> >> - Retire ardour3.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >
> >
> > I think retiring ardour3 at this point is too early - I for one am
> > still adjusting to the ardour4 interface.
>
>
> There should be some consistency in the naming and versioning of packages.
> A crazy example is rosegarden: Now version 14.02 and the name is ...
> rosegarden4 :-)
>
> --
>
> MT
>
> _______________________________________________
> music mailing list
> music at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/music/attachments/20150508/b37c658d/attachment.html>