Regarding the section "Mass Package Rebuilds - Papering Over Cracks or Shaking the Tree?" on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue84

[Oisin Feeley]

I'm confused.  I thought I understood the issue, but obviously I
don't.  More importantly I'm not sure what the erratum should be?

I like Thomas and Thorsten's idea of adding an erratum to the issue in
which an error occurred, and also adding a brief erratum in the next
issue.  As Thorsten points out it's fairly normal practice for other
publications.

Apologies for getting it wrong, and for still not getting it.  :(

Does Thorsten have a suggestion for a brief clarification?  That would
help a lot.

Oisin

On 4/23/07, Thomas Chung <tchung at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
> > Agreed, but things happen. Fixing them in the wiki is better then
> > letting wrong stuff stay there while it is the current issue. In
> > addition it might be the best to mention the error and its fix in the
> > next issue somewhere (a special errata section maybe) and everybody
> > should be happy afaics. That how print magazines do it, too (at least
> > here in Germany).
>
> Yes, we'll fixed them on the wiki as well as issuing an Errata FWN if
> necessary.
> Regards,
> --
> Thomas Chung
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-news-list mailing list
> Fedora-news-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list
>