Regarding the section "Mass Package Rebuilds - Papering Over Cracks or Shaking the Tree?" on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue84

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Tue Apr 24 04:54:06 UTC 2007


On 23.04.2007 21:17, Thomas Chung wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Oisin Feeley <oisin.feeley at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm confused.  I thought I understood the issue, but obviously I
>> don't.  More importantly I'm not sure what the erratum should be?
>>
>> I like Thomas and Thorsten's idea of adding an erratum to the issue in
>> which an error occurred, and also adding a brief erratum in the next
>> issue.  As Thorsten points out it's fairly normal practice for other
>> publications.
>>
>> Apologies for getting it wrong, and for still not getting it.  :(
>>
>> Does Thorsten have a suggestion for a brief clarification?  That would
>> help a lot.
>
> I'm still waiting an official "Errata Request" from Thorsten.
> After we review the submission, we'll update the wiki and issue an
> Errata FWN if necessary.
> Regards,

Sorry, timezones are fun -- I shut down the computer and went to bed
yesterday when the discussion started here.

CU
thl




More information about the news mailing list