Fedora Weekly News 195

Pascal Calarco pcalarco at nd.edu
Mon Sep 28 19:40:42 UTC 2009


On 28/09/09 03:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 15:05 -0400, Pascal Calarco wrote:
>> Great, thanks for the feedback, Rahul!  This is indeed useful feedback.
>
>>> I don't think announcements to devel-announce list should be mingled
>>> with general announcement. The initial summary should cover only major
>>> announcements and devel-announce mails should be in a separate
>>> development beat.
>
> Pascal, could you avoid top-posting? It leads to confusing quoting
> situations like the above :)
>
> I agree with Rahul, however we're still suffering from the lack of
> anyone to write a development beat, I believe, which makes it less
> practical. I was going to volunteer for this a while back, but realized
> I just don't have the time :(

Yes, the development beat is really key, and we need to find someone for 
this.  I wonder if we could kick this up to FESCo to see if they could 
identify/persuade someone to revive?

As a side note, I also spoke to David Nalley when I was at Ohio Linux 
Fest this past weekend about reviving the security advisories beat 
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Beats/SecurityAdvisories).  David 
just doesn't have time right now to do this, and is going to try to find 
someone.

David, I thought about this over the weekend, and I think this is a beat 
I could pick up, if need be.  Seems like just a matter of subscribing to 
the fedora-package-announce mailing list and aggregating the items 
marked security for the beat for the various releases?

   - pascal




More information about the news mailing list