opensource at till.name
Tue Aug 26 08:51:38 UTC 2008
On Mon August 25 2008, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Now the downside to doing this is that it would require any OCaml
> users of EPEL 5 to recompile their software. This may just be a
> simple recompile, but there are also worst-case scenarios such as
> people using and relying on the old camlp4 who may have to make
> modifications of their software. So it's quite a big disruption for
> everyone. I'm also very aware that EPEL is supposed to be long-term
How about doing the update when EPEL is based on RHEL 5.3. Then there could be
also an announcement that EPEL updated it and at this time RHEL/CentOS users
will expect bigger updates that normally.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ocaml-devel/attachments/20080826/578fbd9b/attachment.bin
More information about the ocaml-devel