[Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 8 09:47:41 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108





------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2006-08-08 05:38 EST -------
(In reply to comment #31)
> (In reply to comment #30)
> > I will prefer not to move docs from /usr/share/gutenprint/doc to
> > /usr/share/doc/gutenprint.
> 
> Hmmm, we don't seem to have anything in the guidelines for this AFAICS. But IMHO
> all docs should be marked as %doc and thus should land in
> /usr/share/doc/<packagename-version-release> (the proper place used by all other
> packages)
> 
> Maybe we need to add such a rule :-/

Sure if you think like that. Primary looking at package said me that let that
doc files be in /usr/share/gutenprint/doc
Then i check under /usr/share on my system using
find . -name doc * and i got following output
./sane/xsane/doc
./cups/doc
./apps/quanta/doc
./sgml/docbook/xsl-stylesheets-1.69.1-5/htmlhelp/doc
./scrollkeeper/doc
./vim/vim70/doc
./eclipse/plugins/org.python.pydev_0.9.3/PySrc/ThirdParty/logilab/common/doc
./eclipse/plugins/org.python.pydev_0.9.3/PySrc/ThirdParty/logilab/pylint/doc
./pear/doc
./gutenprint/doc
where some of the entries belongs to Fedora Core packages.

So it looks to me that either we have different strategy for Fedora Extras or we
have some Guidelines that will require a major changes when a package moves from
Fedora Extras to Fedora Core. Then i would like to see that Guidelines page.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list