[Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 16 16:04:54 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: CGAL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168
------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-08-16 11:55 EST -------
> - Static libs:
My view on static libs is somewhere between Patrice and Ralf. In
situations where upstream does not provide a build mechanism for
shared libs then I think it is acceptable for Fedora Extras packagers
to ship static libs in -devel (that is, I don't think its necessary to
force FE packagers to modify the build files to the extent needed to
produce shared instead of static). And, this view is entirely
consistent with the Packaging Guidelines as they are currently
written.
That said, we can always submit patches to the upstream folks and try
to help them build and use shared libs. Helping the upstream projects
is an honorable thing! :-)
In any case, using the latest (-14) SRPM:
+ significantly cleaned up spec file (good!)
+ built for me in mock on FC5-i386
+ has an ability to work with LEDA but, since LEDA is now
proprietary, its fine that we don't try to use it (OK)
- has an ability to work with TAUCS and, since TAUCS is LGPL,
we should seriously consider packaging it for FE and using
it as a CGAL build dependency
Anyway, I'll submit a more thorough review later this week...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list