[Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827





------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2006-07-10 15:38 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Couldn't we get around the abiquity by just using perl(Net::SLeay) ?

Yes, things depending on the Net::SSLeay module should have a dependency on
perl(Net::SSLeay).  At the time I did the rename there were some packages using
name based dependencies to this so the Provides could not be just dropped.

> those files should probably be chmodded in CVS.

Shouldn't be needed.  Unless something has changed recently, the only thing CVS
remembers is whether files have executable bits or not, and permissions like
0666 don't propagate anywhere.  Files are usually 0555 or 0444 inside the repo,
and on checkout/export they retain the executable status while other bits are
set according to the checkouter's umask.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.