[Bug 198834] Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sage -  OpenGL extensions library using SDL
Alias: sage

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2006-07-14 04:07 EST -------
- rpmlint output clean
- package name meets package naming guidelines
- spec file name matches package %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- package licensed with open source compatible license
O license does not match upstream license
- license included in %doc
- spec file in American english
- spec file is legible
- sources match upstream
4eea72b30a88dbe5d512009913462fc3  sage-0.1.2.tar.gz
- package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC-5
- all dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
- package properly containst %post/%postun ldconfig
- package is not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
- package does not contain duplicate files
- file permissions set properly
- package contains proper %clean section
- macro usage is consistent
- package contains permissible content
- package does not contain large documentation
- files in %doc do not affect runtime
- header files are in devel
- pkgconfig files are in devel
- libraries w/o suffix are in devel
- devel package requires base package
- package does not contain any .la files
- package is not a GUI needing .desktop files
- package does not own files or directories owned by other packages


==== MUST ====
- devel package should Requires: pkgconfig
- use %{_mandir} instead of %{_datadir}/man
- notify upstream about --disable-static failure
- fix license to match upstream license
- had to download source from:
http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/worldforge/sage-0.1.2.tar.gz
Source0 should be updated accordingly

==== SHOULD =====
- add a %check even though it doesnt do anything now, it may in future


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.