[Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-07-20 20:12 EST -------
I had no problems building in rawhide, but rpmlint is very unhappy:

Tons of rpath warnings:
  E: pulseaudio binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath  
/usr/lib64/pulse-0.9/modules/libprotocol-esound.so
['/usr/lib64/pulse-0.9/modules/', '/usr/lib64']
and 69 others.  The usual libtool hack doesn't work.

This looks like a script but isn't executable:
  E: pulseaudio non-executable-script /etc/pulse/default.pa 0644

Some setuid bits:
  E: pulseaudio setuid-binary /usr/bin/pulseaudio root 04755
  E: pulseaudio non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/pulseaudio 04755
which will need to be discussed to make sure we're not getting into any security
issues.

Some no-documentation warnings:
  W: pulseaudio-devel no-documentation
  W: pulseaudio-lib-glib no-documentation
  W: pulseaudio-lib-zeroconf no-documentation
  W: pulseaudio-module-alsa no-documentation
  W: pulseaudio-module-x11 no-documentation
  W: pulseaudio-module-zeroconf no-documentation
  W: pulseaudio-utils no-documentation
which are probably OK but I'll have to check.

This is problematic:
  E: pulseaudio-utils invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libpulsedsp.so libpulsedsp.so
but unfortunately I'm not entirely sure how to fix it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.