[Bug 199688] Review Request: virt-manager

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: virt-manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199688


berrange at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER           |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com  2006-07-24 14:05 EST -------
The %extra_release stuff is not intended to be used for formal release builds.
We have a automated builder system which builds snapshots of the app from source
24x7, which defines %extra_release based on a timestamp to distinguish snapshot
RPM builds, from formal Fedora releases. I can take it out of the spec file if
desired, or put a comment in as to its intended use.

Do the automatic python requires pick up any versioning information? If not then
I think it could be desirable to leave in the requires lines for python libvirt
& dbus packages, so that if people try to deploy the RPM they don't do so
against an older version of libvirt / dbus, which are known not to work. The
pygtk, gconf & ctypes deps could easily come out though because I don't believe
that's any critical versioning info that would be lost.

I'll produce an updated spec file with fixes for the .pyo %ghost & full URL for
%source, in the next few days.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.