[Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library)
Alias: bitgtkmm

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2006-07-29 20:07 EST -------
8-->
It's there. It's in the standard devel line, right above the specific requires 
that I add for bitgtkmm:
  Requires:         %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
<--8

D'oh!

8-->
> Blocker : run rpm -qa --requires on the installed bitgtkmm. Quite a lot of the
> output are for standard libs, but you cannot rely on people having gtkmm
> installed (or a few of the others)

Those are all added by rpmbuild.
<--8

No. These are packages required to run. Say I didn't have atkmm on my machine
(just as an example). Without the R atkmm being explictly states in the spec
file, the package would know no better until it gets to a point that atkmm is
needed and then it falls over dead.

I had a similar problem with Anjuta-1.2.4a a while back in that gtkmm was not in
as an explicit R. However, when you came to try and create a gtkmm package, the
software complained like crazy. Add the R line for gtkmm and everything was
happy again.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.