[Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Nov 9 19:21:11 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214751





------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2006-11-09 14:21 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=140809)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140809&action=view)
Patch with some interesting fixes from Suse

I've spend some hours taking a look and I've come to the same conclusion
as the Debian maintainer, this is very hard to fix for 64 bit. More then
that fixing probably will also include fixing / changing all xview using
clients!

Luckily all 64 bit platforms we support also have a 32 bit compatibility
option, so I think we should just not build xview (and apps using it)
for x86_64 / ppc64. It would be a good idea IMHO in cases like this to
add xview + deps + packages using it to a list of packages to copy over
to the x86_64 repo from the i386 repo, so that it will be readily
available for those who want it.

My taking a look started with suse since they had x86_64 packages of
xview in their repo, but appearantly these have had the famous suse QA
done do them (iow none). I did find some other interesting patches in
there, which I have bundled in a smaller one with possible real fixes
and a larger one which fixes a load of warnings (but no where near all
warnings). I also have a patch which fixes some 64 bit related warnings
by adding the necessary prototypes, which isn't enough to get this
running but IMHO still should be applied / send upstream (Debian claims
to be upstream these days) as it is an improvement.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list