[Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 17 11:41:17 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-17 06:41 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Yeah, this also seems correct to me : No need to "provide" the old names, as
> they shouldn't have been used other than explicitly (not from other package
> requirements). The obsoletes are required though, to provide a clean upgrade
> path, and are correct with the last known version.
> Please start the review ASAP or let me know if you'd like me to do it instead,
> as I'm quite impatient to have this audacious update available ;-)
Thanks for testing this package.
Based on above comment
+ package builds in mock (development i386)FC7.
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM.
+ rpmlint on RPMs is not silent but as per above comments in bugzilla they
can be ignored.
+ source files match upstream.
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ COPYING included in %doc.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc files.
+ no -devel subpackage exists
+ available subpackages are audacious-plugins-jack,audacious-plugins-arts,
+ as subpackages are packaging .so files post and postun called /sbin/ldconfig
+ Used update-desktop-database correctly
+ no .la files.
+ no translations available
- Does NOT owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
I saw that some directories are owned in audacious rpm whereas there is no
need to own them by audacious but it should be owned by audacious-plugins.
Make it own by audacious-plugins
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review