[Bug 207839] Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207839





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-10-06 00:48 EST -------
Well, to disable it, you put
   export QA_SKIP_BUILD_ROOT=1
at the end of %install.

This does get things building, and I think it's acceptable to do this if there's
certainty that the location of the buildroot isn't placed anywhere where it
might affect the execution of any code.

Now, for rpmlint:
  W: lush mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 11)

Loads of these:
  W: lush devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lush/packages/svm/lasvm/lasvm.c
It's a compiler, so devel-file-in-non-devel-package warnings are OK.

What remains is a load of non-executable-script errors.  These four:
   E: lush non-executable-script /usr/share/lush/etc/compile-all 0644
   E: lush non-executable-script /usr/share/lush/etc/lush-find-string 0644
   E: lush non-executable-script /usr/share/lush/etc/make-html-manual 0644
   E: lush non-executable-script /usr/share/lush/etc/make-latex-manual 0644
are the only ones that aren't demos or examples.  Should they even be packaged?
 They look like build-time utilities.

Should the demos and examples be packaged as documentation?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.