[Bug 206837] Review Request: TurboCheetah - TurboGears plugin to support use of Cheetah templates

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Oct 10 03:34:50 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: TurboCheetah - TurboGears plugin to support use of Cheetah templates


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206837





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-10-09 23:34 EST -------
Ah, OK.  I changed Source0 to
http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/source/T/TurboCheetah/TurboCheetah-%{version}.tar.gz

The one remaining issue I see is that this package needs to own
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/turbocheetah.

* source files match upstream:
   52e12130302a218a8e3b925447041be4  TurboCheetah-0.9.5.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   python-turbocheetah = 0.9.5-3.fc6
  =
   python(abi) = 2.4
   python-cheetah >= 1.0
* %check is not present; tests not runnable.
X needs to own /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/turbocheetah
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list