[Bug 210087] Review Request: pekwm - Light weight window manager

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pekwm - Light weight window manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210087





------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net  2006-10-14 10:03 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> 
> So my proposal is, keep sysconfdir as is, but move the 
> scrips to %_bindir, and use sed yourself to regenerate menu from
> data/menu.in.
When you say this do you mean to leave it like I have it now, or remove what I
have now and let this stuff be places in %{_sysconfdir} 

> 
> A wild guess is that to put the scripts for example in %_bindir
> you could just redefine scriptsdir on the make install command line.

This sounds fine to me, Ill see what I can do to get it like that.

 
> Otherwise scripts use pkill from procps, and also there seems
> to be a need for xprop, which is a virtual provides of 
> xorg-x11-utils.

Does there need to be a requires for this or are they pretty much a standard
tool to have on board?

 
> The default menu brings in a lot of dependencies. I am not convinced
> what should be done there. Have a menu with wrong entries? Trim
> it down and add requires? 
> 
> Would you feel like modifying fluxbox-xdg-menu, remove the footer
> and header, change parseMenu to generate pekwm format, 
> and remove the Submenus from Submenu = "Editors" to 
> Submenu = "Development", and replace them by an entry like:
> Entry = "" { Actions = "Dynamic %{bindir}/pekwm-xdg-menu" }?
> This seems to be the best thing to do, currently it doesn't
> really integrate with fedora.

Solved this. :)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.