[Bug 210323] Review Request: perl-File-DesktopEntry - Object to handle .desktop files

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-File-DesktopEntry - Object to handle .desktop files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210323


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-10-14 15:56 EST -------
Michael, everything on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl is either
advisory or contingent on the faulure of some part of RPM's automatic dependency
generation.  RPM actually does a pretty good job of figuring out most Perl
dependencies, and the resulting packages don't generally need much in the way of
extraneous bits.

* source files match upstream:
   9c97efa062c04bcb86a0a6a3707355d1  File-DesktopEntry-0.02.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(File::DesktopEntry) = 0.02
   perl-File-DesktopEntry = 0.02-1.fc6
  =
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(File::Spec)
   perl(strict)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=2, Tests=10,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.06 cusr +  0.03 csys =  0.09 CPU)
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.