[Bug 208208] Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208





------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com  2006-10-14 23:13 EST -------
(In reply to comment #22)
> Andrew, is there any chance you'd like to co-maintain this with Thomas?  I'm
> willing to vouch for your review and do the sponsor dance.

OK, sounds good.

> As an aside: this works with libgcj and GNU classpath?  Wow.  Truly free java
> really is getting there, isn't it?

Yes, it works on FC-6 libgcj.  We're making good progress on our AWT and Swing
implementations.

(In reply to comment #23)
> Are you sure you don't want to split out all those jars? Yes, it means more work
> for you as a packager of megamek, but it's less work the next time anyone needs
> any of those packages.

I'd prefer to wait until a need for these jars as separate packages is
discovered.  They're all tiny bits of code; introducing five new packages for
them seems heavy-handed.

If you can show me another upstream project that needs any of these bits of
code, I'll separate them out, but I've looked and I can't find any.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.