[Bug 211623] Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211623





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2006-10-20 20:49 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> No, David Flater is the maintainer of both.
Actually you are true.

> 
> > In this html, upstream considers the case that people want to
> > seperate libtcd.
> 
> Still, upstream does not ship a shared library, maybe never will do so.
However providing shared library, not static is preferable.

> How does the DSO versioning scheme you've invented relate to libtcd's
> versioning scheme?
Sorry, but what is "DSO"? 
> 
> Where do you see that libtcd 2.0 and 2.1 are incompatible?
I have re-checked the header files and they are _COMPATIBLE_ .
I agree with the name libtcd.so.2.1.3 .
 
> With every update of xtide, will you check whether the included libtcd
> contains changes? 
Of course. Actually some changes have occured with xtide without
the part of libtcd unchanged.

> And then split it off, build the library packages first,
> and only then build utils and xtide?

I think this is not a bad idea.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.