[Bug 211714] Review Request: perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array - C extension speeds perl-POE

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Oct 25 03:47:06 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array - C extension speeds perl-POE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211714


cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu  2006-10-24 23:47 EST -------
There are redundant requires: lines in the spec.  This causes one require to
be duplicated, and in any case the dependency is correctly picked up by rpm's
auto prov/deps scripts.  The requires: lines should be dropped.

The %files section has a line:
  %{perl_vendorarch}/POE/XS/Queue/Array.pm

This should be changed to %{perl_vendorarch}/POE, otherwise the package will
not own the directories under Array.pm correctly.  Changing it to that will
cause it to own POE/, POE/XS/, etc, etc...

This one isn't a blocker, but I notice the presence of two benchmarking
scripts in the package (bench[12].perl).  I usually try to include things like
this in %doc, as it may be useful to someone down the road.  Note that if you
do include these, you'll need to replace the #! line in bench2.perl so rpmlint
doesn't complain, e.g. via something like:
    perl -pi -e 's|^#!perl|#!/usr/bin/perl|m' bench2.perl

Drop the requires, modify the line in %files, and optionally add the
benchmarking scripts and the package is approved.

+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible. (GPL or Artistic) License text not included
upstream.
+ source files match upstream:
 06b39e893148b2b52ef408809104949e  POE-XS-Queue-Array-0.003.tar.gz
 06b39e893148b2b52ef408809104949e  POE-XS-Queue-Array-0.003.tar.gz.srpm
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
 package builds in mock ( ).
+ rpmlint is silent.
O final provides and requires are sane:
 ** perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array-0.003-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm
 == rpmlint
 == provides
 Array.so()(64bit)
 perl(POE::XS::Queue::Array) = 0.003
 perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array = 0.003-1.fc5
 == requires
 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
X perl(POE::Queue)
X perl(POE::Queue)
X perl(POE::Queue::Array)
 perl(strict)
 perl(vars)
 ** perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array-debuginfo-0.003-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm
 == rpmlint
 == provides
 Array.so.debug()(64bit)
 perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array-debuginfo = 0.003-1.fc5
 == requires
+ no system shared libraries are present.
+ package is not relocatable.
X owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ %check is present and all tests pass:
All tests successful.
Files=2, Tests=2084,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.35 cusr +  0.06 csys =  0.41 CPU)
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ not a GUI app.
+ not a web app.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list