[Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Oct 26 14:09:12 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2006-10-26 10:09 EST -------
(In reply to comment #53)
> Indeed this is rawhide breakage. Either the guidelines or 
> desktop-file-utils should be updated.

Jesse Keating commented on fedora-extras-list.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00722.html

> It works better now, but I am not convinced that it is
> the proper fix. I don't see why you need to send the 
> echo output on STDERR? 
Simply because I wanted to send to stderr because it is a error.
Removing.

> And also it seems that failure should be used instead of echo_failure
> since it does something when with rhgb (show details).
Okay.

> Moreover I think the [ FAILED ] should appear before the explanation.
> It leads to the following code:
> 
>     if test -z "$PORT" ; then
>         failure
>         echo
>         echo $"PORT environment is not set."
>         RETVAL=1
>         return $RETVAL
> 
My recognition is that usually OK of FAILED appears at the last
and the location of "failure" should be under the explanation.

> Another remark is that I think having HOME defaulting to /root is wrong,
> it should be set to a directory below sysconfig, for example 
> %{_sysconfig}/xtide. 
Okay.

> And I am not completly convinced that using 
> nobody as a user is the right thing to do, maybe a specific user
> would be better.
Well, for this I will reply later.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list