[Bug 204852] Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Sep 9 06:05:01 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204852


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |kevin at tummy.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2006-09-09 02:04 EST -------
OK - Package name
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
6edf92504b1b9f9943e3b28011738691  tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25.tar.gz
6edf92504b1b9f9943e3b28011738691  tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25.tar.gz.1
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
See below - No rpmlint output.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it.
OK - Should build in mock.

Issues:

1. The rpmlint error:
E: tuxpaint-stamps incorrect-locale-sv /usr/share/locale/sw/LC_MESSAGES/
tuxpaint-stamps.mo

seems to be saying that sw is a invalid locale, and should be sv?

>From the I18NCheck.py file in rpmlint:

# Associative array of invalid value => correct value
INCORRECT_LOCALES = {
    'in': 'id',
    'in_ID': 'id_ID',
    'iw': 'he',
    'iw_IL': 'he_IL',
    'gr': 'el',
    'gr_GR': 'el_GR',
    'cz': 'cs',
    'cz_CZ': 'cs_CZ',
    'sw': 'sv',
    'lug': 'lg', # 'lug' is valid, but we standardize on 2 letter codes
    'en_UK': 'en_GB'}

So perhaps move the sw locale files to the sv directory?
I think sw is not a valid locale, so those files should be sv files. 

I see tuxpaint itself does this as well, perhaps a bug should be
filed against it?

Thats the only issue I see here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list