[Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Sep 27 07:13:36 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mindi


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317





------- Additional Comments From tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si  2006-09-27 03:13 EST -------
Hi Bruno, Dennis!

I've been watching this review request and the one for mondo (bug 187318) for a
while and I'm really eager to see mondorescue become part of the Fedora project
(Fedora Extras, in this case).
The problem is, Fedora currently doesn't provide sufficient backup facilities in
Core or Extras. Sure, we have rdiff-backup, duplicity, dump, tar, etc., but
nothing can compare with mondorescue's simplicity and ability to do a disaster
recovery bare-metal restore. I've been researching various linux lvm-capable
bare-metal restore solutions and mondorescue is my best bet so far.

Taking into account the aforementioned issues, we should try to be more flexible
and respect the specific nature of bare-metal restore process and try to work
together, especially if the current upstream maintainer and lead developer of
mondorescue is taking time to package mindi and mondo according to Fedora Extras
Guidelines.

Best regards,
Tadej

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list