[Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 3 10:48:21 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488
------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-04-03 06:48 EST -------
MUST:
* package is named appropriately
* it is legal for Fedora to distribute this
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* specfile name matches %{name}
* verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do)
* summary and description fine
* correct buildroot
* %{?dist} is used
* license text included in package and marked with %doc
* package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/)
X changelog format fine (see earlier bug comments)
* Packager tag not used
* Vendor tag not used
* Distribution tag not used
* License used and not Copyright
* Summary tag does not end in a period
* if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(
* Source match upstream
$ md5sum yum-presto-0.3.3.tar.bz2
fd1984365bdbe61aca8114ab47eccefa yum-presto-0.3.3.tar.bz2
$ md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/yum-presto-0.3.3.tar.bz2
fd1984365bdbe61aca8114ab47eccefa rpmbuild/SOURCES/yum-presto-0.3.3.tar.bz2
* specfile is legible
* package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86
* BuildRequires are proper
* make sure lines are <= 80 characters
* specfile written in American English
* no -doc sub-package necessary
* no libraries
* no rpath
* config files uses %config(noreplace)
* not a GUI app
* no -devel sub-package necessary
* macros used appropriately and consistently
* no %makeinstall
* install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}
* no locale data
* no cp usage so no need to worry about -p
* split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines
* package not relocatable
* package contains code
* package owns all directories and files
* no %files duplicates
* file permissions fine
? %defattrs present
- should it be %defattr(-, root, root, -)
* %clean present
* %doc files do not affect runtime
* not a web app
* verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs
$ rpm -q --requires -p rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/yum-presto-0.3.3-1.noarch.rpm
config(yum-presto) = 0.3.3-1
deltarpm >= 3.4
python >= 2.4
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
yum >= 3.0
$ rpm -q --provides -p rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/yum-presto-0.3.3-1.noarch.rpm
config(yum-presto) = 0.3.3-1
yum-presto = 0.3.3-1
* run rpmlint on the binary RPMs
- see previous bug comments
SHOULD:
* package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc
* package should build on i386
? package should build in mock
- I haven't tried, but I don't think it'll be a problem
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list