[Bug 233850] Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233850


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-04-09 11:00 EST -------
Well, for 0.4-2:

* Timestamps
  - Please keep timestamps on files which are not
    created or modified during build stage as much as
    possible (for this package, png/svg/xml files).

    The following method works for this package.
---------------------------------------------------
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -p"
---------------------------------------------------

* Duplicate entry
  - mockbuild says:
---------------------------------------------------
+ /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/tasks-0.4-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/doc/tasks-0.4
+ cp -pr AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README
/var/tmp/tasks-0.4-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/doc/tasks-0.4
+ exit 0
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tasks/tasks-ui.xml
Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
---------------------------------------------------
    Note: the entry 
---------------------------------------------------
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
foo/
---------------------------------------------------
    (where foo is a directory) means the directory foo/ itself and
    all the files/directories/etc under foo/, while
---------------------------------------------------
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%dir foo/
---------------------------------------------------
    means the directory foo/ only.

Well,
-------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Before being sponsored:

This package will be accepted with another few work. 
But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) 
must sponsor you.

Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other 
submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. 
For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) 
are required to "show that you have an understanding 
of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described
on :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored

Usually there are two ways to show this.
A. submit other review requests with enough quality.
B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request
   (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do
   a formal review)

When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other 
person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report 
so that I can check your comments or review request.

Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to
review can be checked on:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone
NOTE: FE-NEW blockers are now not complete.

Review guidelines are described mainly on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.