[Bug 235804] New: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 10 07:09:35 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804

           Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocamlSDL.spec
SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocamlSDL-0.7.2-1.src.rpm
Description:
Runtime (and development) libraries to allow programs written in OCaml to write to SDL (Simple DirectMedia Layer) interfaces.

rpmlint:
ocamlSDL-0.7.2-1.rpm:
W: ocamlSDL ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllsdlstub.so
(I don't know if an exception can be made here, I can't find much on the problem)
ocamlSDL-devel-0.7.2-1.rpm:
W: ocamlSDL-devel no-documentation
W: ocamlSDL-devel ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib/ocaml/sdl/sdlwm.cmi
(1: docs are in the main package, which is strictly depended on, 2: Ditto about exception)
ocamlSDL-0.7.2-1.src.rpm:
Clean

I believe the files are in the right place etc etc, but I have one note:
One package which depends on this (which I'm putting in for Package Review later today), depends on this for building, but not for use, I'm worried that the libraries are somehow been configured statically, not sure if it's a problem with this package or the other package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list