[Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Apr 18 19:02:52 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|normal                      |medium

kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|177841                      |
              nThis|                            |
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-04-18 15:02 EST -------
>I get this warm fuzzy feeling when I get no errors or warnings, you
>see. Also note that "all the subpackages" at the moment counts one :-)

indeed. :)

>Well, I don't know of anyone using varnish technology for anything but
>varnish, so for an initial release, I'd say it's not necessary. A
>devel package should perhaps include some header files and some
>hacking starting point docs too. If we can push it for later, I'll ask
>some of the developers for this.

ok. Yeah, if you could talk to upstream about making a more fully featured devel
package before shipping it, that would be great. 

I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED, and I would be happy
to sponsor you. You can continue the process from: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list