[Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|normal                      |medium




------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org  2007-04-19 11:47 EST -------
(In reply to comment #26)
> 3) What does release_func accomplish? It obfusticates the fact that the 
release
> tag violates policy. It should be a single integer followed by the release 
tag,
> unless you're bumping an old tree in which case you can add a number after 
the
> release tag.

Actually, if %release_func is not defined, the default %release_func:
  %global release_func() %1%{?dist}
seems to do the right thing.

However, that macro is obfuscating. It should be removed from the spec file, 
and Release: should be:
  Release: 6%{?dist}


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.