[Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Apr 22 22:33:03 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|normal                      |medium

jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jpmahowald at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2007-04-22 18:33 EST -------
It builds but does not run:

Loading AI: passive.lua
src/ai/script_ai.cpp:345: incorrect argument
incorrect argument
stack traceback:
        [C]: in function 'DefineAi'
        [string "/usr/share/boswars/scripts/ai.lua"]:43: in function 'RegisterAi'
        [string "/usr/share/boswars/scripts/ais/passive.lua"]:34: in main chunk
        [C]: in function 'Load'
        [string "/usr/share/boswars/scripts/ai.lua"]:101: in main chunk
        [C]: in function 'Load'
        [string "/usr/share/boswars/scripts/stratagus.lua"]:220: in main chunk


I traced this down to stratagus vs. bundled boswars stratagus fork. In
ai/script_ai.cpp, CclDefineAi function, stratagus from Fedora srpm checks for 4
arguments, the bundled boswars engine 3. Unless you want to patch the scripts
and whatever else boswars does differently to match stratagus, this seems
another vote for using included stratagus.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list