[Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Apr 29 15:18:26 UTC 2007

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mindi


------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com  2007-04-29 11:18 EST -------
I still stand on my earlier comments: you've not understood what is mindi's
goal, not why I need to control the way busybox is built.
I don't use whatever busybox, I make a special binary based on busybox hold
under rootfs/sbin that will be use at restore time. You asked to not have a
binary in the tree, and I agreed on that, even if it wasn't a priority for the
project. Now let me use what I need, no what you would like us to do !! We're
not here to discuss on upstream functions but to package an existing app !

Now, I think I won't pass any more time on this. 
After all people wanting to use it on fedore have packages since a long time,
and use them. My goal was to make it easy for fedore users. You disagree. That's
fine. I'll rather work on creating repodata info and config files.

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

More information about the package-review mailing list