[Bug 238366] Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Apr 30 08:35:19 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366


dev at nigelj.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |dev at nigelj.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com  2007-04-30 04:35 EST -------
Okay, happy to review.

(In reply to comment #3)
> The 3rd paragraph is there to make it clear / emphasize that although
> autodownloader is mean't to download files which we cannot distribute, that
> autodownloader itself is 100% OSS.
Autodownloader would have to be OSS to make it into Fedora, if you want to make 
it clear, I'd perfer something to the effect of:
"NOTE: Autodownloader while open source may download files which are not 
permitted to be distributed in Fedora"
> The order of the 1st and 2nd paragraph is like this, because I think the 
proper
> order to describe the use is first describing why and then how. The how only
> makes little sense without first knowing the why.
I think what it is, is more important than why you want to use it, why you want 
to use it, is what a developer or another packager would want to know, and they 
most likely have had a tip off from another maintainer that the package is 
useful for what they wish to do

The reason you have what it is first, is so users can decide if they really 
want to have it on their system without been bored to death first.

Also, I'm tempted to suggest that before inclusion, a database of downloaded 
files may need to be created, (also meaning that programs that have downloaded 
files, should ALWAYS require autodownloader) with a %preun to remove downloaded 
files (remembering that you wouldn't be able to remove autodownloader without 
removing dependencies that require the files first).  This prevents 
unneeded/unwanted files been left behind after uninstall.

Both are only suggestions as I don't think anything specific is in 
PackagingGuidelines regarding this yet, but I will check while testing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list