[Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:  sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-08-05 13:16 EST -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> The translation of "/usr/sbin -> %_sbindir" also targets /usr/sbin/semodule?
  Yes.
> In my understanding, the location of external commands don't have any 
> relationship with %_prefix of sepostgresql.
 - Actually policycoreutils spec file uses %_sbindir . Using proper
   macros is necessary because we have to make it sure that spec files in
   Fedora follow FHS. So we expect that semodule is under %_sbindir.
   Let's say %_prefix changes, then if macros are used properly, all the
   affected commands will change the location properly. If you still
   use /usr/sbin, it surely fails.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.