[Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992





------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au  2007-08-09 10:39 EST -------
Mamoru, thanks for taking a look:

(In reply to comment #7)
Updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe.spec
SRPM: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe-0.2-4.fc7.src.rpm

- add comment re Source1..4 creation
- mod .desktop category to Education, although some or all of the {Education,
Graphics, DataVisualization, Geography, Amusement, ImageProcessing } might fit ?
- del .desktop category deprecated items
- del extraneous BR and Requires(post/postun) for desktop-file-utils
> desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \
When I followed other packages as an example, it seems that --delete-original
was normal. Is this a changed packaging standard ?
- mod desktop-file-install to simpler command, using SOURCEx
- add ownership of app data directory
- mod ownership of icon data to glglobe specific filenames

(In reply to comment #8)
- mod License to meet new Licensing Guidelines
Changed but didn't work out rpmlint's unhappiness until I realized I hadn't
updated rpmlint on that machine ;)

Current spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe.spec
Updated SRPM:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe-0.2-4.fc7.src.rpm

A query: is it worth testing in fc6 and fdevel {my testing has been in f7}?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.