[Bug 251536] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Aug 10 04:51:33 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251536





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-08-10 00:51 EST -------
This package doesn't seem to build for me under devel mock: 

 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -Wall -I../include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
-m64 -mtune=generic -I/usr/include/xorg -I../src -MT
diamondtouch_drv_la-diamondtouch.lo -MD -MP -MF
.deps/diamondtouch_drv_la-diamondtouch.Tpo -c diamondtouch.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o
.libs/diamondtouch_drv_la-diamondtouch.o
diamondtouch.c: In function 'DtReadInput':
diamondtouch.c:417: warning: implicit declaration of function 'xf86DisableDevice'
diamondtouch.c: In function '_dt_init_axes':
diamondtouch.c:698: error: 'GetMotionHistory' undeclared (first use in this
function)
diamondtouch.c:698: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
diamondtouch.c:698: error: for each function it appears in.)
diamondtouch.c:699: warning: implicit declaration of function 'GetMotionHistorySize'
diamondtouch.c:704: warning: implicit declaration of function
'InitAbsoluteClassDeviceStruct'
make[2]: *** [diamondtouch_drv_la-diamondtouch.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xf86-input-diamondtouch-0.2.0/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xf86-input-diamondtouch-0.2.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91130 (%build)

Missing BuildRequires? Or something else going on? 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list