[Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-08-11 11:25 EST -------
Actually almost nothing to be reviewed, however:

* rpmlint complaints:
--------------------------------------------------
W: bouml-doc invalid-license GPL
W: bouml-doc no-%build-section
--------------------------------------------------
  - Change the license to GPLv2+
  - Add %build section, even if it is empty
--------------------------------------------------
$ rpmlint -I no-%build-section
no-%build-section :
The spec file does not contain a %build section.  Even if some packages
don't directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's
configuration to provide additional "under the hood" functionality, such as
injection of automatic -debuginfo subpackages.  Add the section, even if
empty.
--------------------------------------------------
  Other thing okay. Please fix the issue above before
  committing to CVS.


--------------------------------------------------
   This package (bouml-doc) is APPROVED by me
--------------------------------------------------

Note: the template of CVSAdminProcedure changed so
      please re-read
      http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.