[Bug 250468] Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Aug 12 14:10:45 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250468


bdpepple at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review-




------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com  2007-08-12 10:10 EST -------
MD5Sum:
ef7787845e698017b370923b919ab023  vcmd-0.09.tar.bz2

Good:
* Source URL is canonical
* Upstream source tarball verified
* Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines
* Group Tag is from the official list
* Buildroot has all required elements
* All directories are owned by this or other packages
* All necessary BuildRequires listed.
* Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined
* Files have appropriate permissions and owners
* Package builds fine in Mock.

Bad:
* Not all paths use macros.  In particular, look at '/usr/sbin/'.  refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros
* rpmlint produces the following errors:
 W: vcmd no-documentation
This error can be ignored, since the tarball contains no documentation. 

 W: vcmd invalid-license GPL
This error needs to fixed though. I looked through the tarball, and couldn't
find any mention of the license used.  Also, if it is actually GPL, we will need
to clarify what version according to the new license tag guidelines. refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing

Note: Looks like a newer version of this package is available.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list