[Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Aug 17 05:25:00 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-08-17 01:24 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
9013466a6dead8c2072e49826e9a7ab7  Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton-0.01.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test outputs nothing
+ Provides: perl(Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton) = 0.01
+ Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Glib) perl(Gtk2)
perl(strict) perl(warnings)

APPROVED.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list