[Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163





------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com  2007-08-24 03:12 EST -------
Thanks for the update.

(In reply to comment #6)
> > I wonder if it would be useful at all or make sense to consider subpackaging
> > the gothic and mincho fonts?  (Anyway that could also easily be done later
> > if it is useful since they are in the same tarball anyway.)
> 
> It could be. I'm not sure how much it's useful. but yeah I can.

Okay, thanks, looks good to me. :)
Some basic users of Japanese may just be happy with gothic.

> > W: sazanami-fonts symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/sazanami-fonts
> > /usr/share/fonts/sazanami-fonts
> 
> Hmm, I'm not sure about it. there were some discussions but I don't see any
> conclusions at the mailing list that started Threads from:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-July/msg00444.html
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-August/msg00096.html

Thanks for digging out the thread. :)

Anyway it is not a blocker anyway.  I got the impression the preference
was for relsymlinks for better behaviour in a chroot tree but for fonts
maybe it is not such a big issue.

> nor any updates at the wiki:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureNoMoreXFS

I agree this should be updated first.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.