[Bug 261881] Review Request: écolier-fonts - Ãcolier court fonts

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 29 00:03:38 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: écolier-fonts - Écolier court fonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-08-28 20:03 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> I'm not too worried about the non-utf8 locale case:
> 1. utf-8 is the default fedora encoding, so that's what we should optimize for

I am not sure that it is relevant here. The issue is would it
be right to have encoded characters in a package name.

> 2. almost every fedora locale migrated to utf-8 long long ago

No, the otherwise encoded locales are still there, like fr_FR.

> 3. I thoroughly doubt any user of a non-utf8 locale (be it because this locale
> is some complex obscure asian stuff or be it because the user is an US sysadmin
> which has not understood i18n needs yet) will be interested in this particular
> package

Even if the user isn't interested in this particular package, the package
name may still appears somewhere (in repoquery calls, for example). Or
as a dependency.


I don't feel strongly about that issue, but I have seen so 
many trouble with encodings that I think it is better to be
cautious.

I know some people still using 8 bit locales. That is a situation
we shouldn't prevent, and we should leave this choice to the user
(even though we are more targetting utf8).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list