[Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:  sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522





------- Additional Comments From tgl at redhat.com  2007-08-29 00:49 EST -------
Hmm ... if you changed HeapTupleHeader then it is pretty much completely unsafe to load *any* standard 
extension module into sepostgres; we have no way to tell which ones depend on that data structure.  But I 
think all the PLs do, and many contrib modules do, so none of those RPMs are compatible and you need to 
supply substitutes.

I wonder if it'd be feasible to hide the sepostgres add-on data into the t_hoff padding, the way OIDs have 
been handled the last few releases?  It's a bit of a long shot, but otherwise we're going to have a real hard 
time with binary dependencies.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.