[Bug 226795] Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795





------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com  2007-02-02 06:17 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #5)
> > > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > >
> > > > IMO, all but the sdc-prefixed ones are way too generic. Does this package
> > > > support --program-prefix?
> > > 
> > > While I see your point here, I can see using --program-prefix potentially
> > > causing problems with dependent packages...
> > > 
> > Would it be better to install everything under /usr/sdcc-i386, as suggested for
> > cross compilers? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/CrossCompilers
> No. This would conflict with GCC's conventions.
> 
> But what would work is to install the apps somewhere outside of %{_bindir},
> e.g
> /usr/lib/sdcc/bin
> or
> /usr/libexec/sdcc
> and to install symlinks or wrapper scripts named "sdcc-<app>" into %{_bindir}
> 
> Other packages wanting to use the "non-prefixed" versions then could apply
> PATH=/usr/lib/scdc/bin:$PATH (or similar) to access the unprefixed versions.
> 
FIXED. Binaries are now installed into /usr/libexec/sdcc, and symlinks are
created in /usr/bin.

Updated spec and srpm files are available at ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.