[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Feb 3 13:36:05 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225617
roozbeh at farsiweb.info changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |roozbeh at farsiweb.info
------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2007-02-03 08:36 EST -------
Random notes:
* rpmlint output:
W: bitmap-fonts invalid-license distributable
W: bitmap-fonts no-url-tag
W: bitmap-fonts-cjk invalid-license distributable
W: bitmap-fonts-cjk no-url-tag
W: bitmap-fonts-cjk no-documentation
* It seems that the Lucida fonts are not free software. See the LU_LEGALNOTICE
in the package.
* As this is actually three different set of fonts, the version (0.3) is quite
arbitrary. Also, at least ucs-fonts has released a newer version in 2006, while
the version in bitmap-fonts is from 2003.
* Release is complicated (5.1.1) for no real reason. Should be changed to
integer value (6?).
* BuildRoot should be changed to
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* In the "cjk" subpackage summary, CJK should be spelled with capital letters.
* "Prereq" should be replaced by "Requires" (see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#tags)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list