[Bug 228291] Review Request: hunspell-ca - Catalan hunspell dictionary

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Feb 12 16:03:02 UTC 2007

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ca - Catalan hunspell dictionary


wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |caolanm at redhat.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-02-12 11:02 EST -------
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines 
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream , sha1sum 6e65cf6740f92f5faf74fbde43021d0fceb986b0 
- the package builds in mock, devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is
consistent with the fact that basically it includes only 3 text files)
- the license GPL stated in the tag is the same as the web site says
- there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and
license clearance, so no .la, .pc, static files
- no missing BR
- MINOR: unneeded BR: unzip
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- rpmlint is silent on both src and binary rpm
- code, not content
- no need for -docs as the only doc is just a 31K text file
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 


Obs: upstreamid seems wrong. The date of the files is 12-Apr-2004, not 15-oct-2002.

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

More information about the package-review mailing list