[Bug 228469] Review Request: hunspell-de - German hunspell dictionaries

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 13 10:26:25 UTC 2007

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hunspell-de - German hunspell dictionaries


wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |

------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-02-13 05:26 EST -------
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines 
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream , sha1sum 
09beb35f8fd3753125535a920a1a001ce5b28fa8  de_DE-20051213.zip
de75be0efe486a69a24f13ec33be5bb0357dc599  de_CH-20051213.zip

- the package builds in mock for devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is
consistent with the fact that basically it includes only 3 text files)
- the license GPL stated in the tag is the same as the web site says
- there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and
license clearance, so no need for -doc and no .la, .pc, static files
- no missing BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- rpmlint outputsilent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs as the only doc is just a 5K text file with the GPL license
in Welsh and English
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 


PS: Maybe you could also include the de_AT dictionary files ? They seem to be
based roughly on the same word lists

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

More information about the package-review mailing list